Rating: *****
This is an excellent example of an independent investigation of 9-11. This is not an amateur independent investigation. The opinions presented are of experts, the testimonies are from first-hand witnesses, and the official explanations are straight from the people who were the officials. The voices of protest are the loudest from those who were actually there, and the conflicting reports are from the uninformed news media. One of the more remarkable things about it would be the BBC reporter announcing the unexpected collapse of building seven, while 7 is clearly visible behind her.
Of course, the difficult part about watching something like this is handling all of the facts, and how poorly they're dismissed by members of authority. It's also suspicious, the way that the authority is passed along to people like Henry Kissinger, who as the film points out, is more known for his ability of keeping secrets from the American public than informing them (as head of the 9/11 commission). The eyewitness accounts are unbearably similar, and resonate in frequency as each one points out the same blatant facts. The only thing confusing about the message is what exactly this means.
I'm also not sure if it's pointed out, but a Bush family member was in charge of security in the twin towers just before this event happened. There were also talks about how there was alot of "DataCom" work going on in the buildings, and that parts of it had been shut off. That's all anecdotal evidence, none of which is in this film. Only factual evidence.
No comments:
Post a Comment